Is Vaping Health Risky?
Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, and this makes it hard to assess how the risks are reduced Smok Novo 2 by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are due to smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can’t be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to obtain the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past couple of years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The fact is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just turning to the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we have to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the quantity of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.